Negligent Credentialing Case Cites Landmark Elam v. College Park Hospital Case
/
A pending case in Santa Clara County Superior Court revisits a foundational legal question raised in the landmark Elam v. College Park Hospital ruling: Can a hospital be held directly liable for failing to properly screen and monitor the competence of its staff physicians?
Case: Marybeth Lakso v. HCA Healthcare, Inc. and Good Samaritan Hospital
Court: Santa Clara County Superior Court, Dept. 20 – Judge William J. Monahan
Hearing: Continued to June 6, 2025, at 9:00 AM in Dept. 20
Lakso v. HCA Healthcare: The Plaintiff's Allegations
Marybeth Lakso has filed a lawsuit in Santa Clara County Superior Court against HCA Healthcare, Inc. and Good Samaritan Hospital, alleging she was harmed due to the hospital's failure to uphold its legal duty to ensure the competency of its medical staff. While case-specific details remain limited, the suit aligns with a broader legal theory known as negligent credentialing, which holds hospitals accountable for failing to oversee independent physicians adequately granted admitting privileges.
More About the Defendant: Lakso v. HCA Healthcare
HCA Healthcare, Inc. is a national health system that operates numerous hospitals, including Good Samaritan Hospital in San Jose, California. These institutions are responsible not only for providing medical care but also for selecting and reviewing the doctors who treat patients within their facilities. The lawsuit challenges whether these responsibilities were met in Lakso's case.
Key Legal Question: Lakso v. HCA Healthcare
The primary legal question is whether HCA and Good Samaritan Hospital breached a duty of care by negligently credentialing or retaining a physician who caused patient harm, and whether that breach justifies hospital liability under the Elam precedent. This involves determining whether a hospital must actively investigate and monitor the qualifications and ongoing competency of non-employee medical staff.
The Allegations in the Case:
While the specific facts of Lakso's case have not yet been disclosed in public filings, the action centers on the hospital's alleged failure to properly screen, supervise, or reevaluate a staff physician whose care allegedly caused patient harm. The case explicitly references Elam v. College Park Hospital, a California Court of Appeal decision that established a precedent for holding hospitals liable under the doctrine of corporate negligence when they fail to ensure the competence of medical personnel operating under their roof.
Legal Implications: Lakso v. HCA Healthcare
The Elam decision was a turning point in California healthcare law. It held that hospitals owe a direct duty of care to their patients to exercise reasonable care in selecting and reviewing medical staff. If the court applies Elam in Lakso's case, it could reaffirm and even expand the doctrine of corporate hospital liability, holding institutions directly accountable when independent physicians provide substandard care. It also signals that hospitals may no longer be able to avoid liability simply because a doctor is classified as an independent contractor.
Lakso v. HCA Healthcare: The Employer's Position
As of now, HCA Healthcare and Good Samaritan Hospital have not publicly responded to the complaint. In past cases involving credentialing liability, hospitals often argue that they fulfilled all legal and professional obligations during the credentialing process and that the treating physician—not the institution—is solely liable for any malpractice.
Why This Case Matters: Lakso v. HCA Healthcare
This case could reaffirm or reshape how hospital accountability is viewed in California. The Elam ruling expanded the scope of hospital liability beyond direct employees to include independent physicians granted access to hospital facilities. A decision in Lakso's favor could further define the standards hospitals must meet when credentialing, re-appointing, and monitoring medical staff, with implications for medical malpractice litigation statewide.
What Comes Next for Lakso v. HCA Healthcare
A hearing in the Lakso v. HCA Healthcare case is currently scheduled for June 6, 2025, at 9:00 AM in Department 20 of Santa Clara County Superior Court before Judge William J. Monahan. The court may evaluate early motions or set a discovery schedule. If the Elam precedent plays a central role, this could become a closely watched test case on negligent credentialing and the evolving responsibilities of corporate hospitals.
FAQ: Lakso v. HCA Healthcare
Q: What is negligent credentialing?
A: Negligent credentialing refers to a hospital's failure to properly vet or monitor the qualifications and competence of physicians allowed to practice within its facility.
Q: What did Elam v. College Park Hospital establish?
A: It established that California hospitals can be held directly liable for patient harm if they fail to exercise reasonable care in selecting and overseeing their medical staff, even if those doctors are independent contractors.
Q: Why is this doctrine significant today?
A: As hospitals increasingly operate like healthcare corporations, this doctrine ensures they maintain active responsibility over the medical care provided under their supervision, not just over facility operations.
Q: Can hospitals be sued even if a doctor isn't their employee?
A: Yes. Under the Elam doctrine, hospitals may be held liable for negligent actions related to staffing decisions, regardless of whether the physician is an employee or an independent contractor.
Q: What might this case change?
A: If successful, it could strengthen legal protections for patients and increase pressure on hospitals to reform or reinforce staff credentialing and oversight procedures.
Do you have questions about filing a California employment law complaint? Please contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Knowledgeable employment law attorneys are ready to assist you in various law firm offices in Riverside, San Francisco, Sacramento, San Diego, Los Angeles, and Chicago.
