How to Start Employment Discrimination Lawsuit

This guide provides information and resources for employees on how to sue their employer for violating wrongful termination laws, discrimination laws and other employment laws.

According to the California Labor Code, employees are presumed to work for an employer at-will
Pursuant to the at-will work law, the boss is authorized to discharge employees because of any reason, no reason, a good reason or a bad reason. However your boss cannot discharge your position due to the fact that the you engaged protected conduct. For example, a company cannot legally discharge an employees position due to the fact that the you filed a  wrongful termination claim. Terminating a Your work for this reason may be considered wrongful termination based on discrimination .

In the event that sue an employer based on a violation of wrongful termination laws, you are required to complete administrative prerequisites. First, employees must make a legal claim with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing or the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). Once looking into the contentions about a violation of wrongful termination laws, the agency almost always sends you a “Right to Sue” Letter, which gives workers to hire an attorney.

California Employment Lawyer Guide

California is prestigious for being one of the biggest states in the universe. All of the powerful employers in the United States have developed workers in the state. However, despite the fact that it is one of the greatest spots in the country, people have recently been hiring lawyers to look into illegal workplace conduct dealing with employees rights with respect to workplace discrimination laws.

Prior to Hiring a California employment lawyer, there are A Few Important Issues Workers Should Know.

The first factor that people Should Think About Before Retaining a Employment Law Firm is of course finances. Many employees attempting to sue their current or former employer don't have the financial resources needed to go up against a large company in a case for illicit company activity dealing with illicit wrongful termination laws, discrimination laws and wage & hour laws. As such the first, important thing Employees Should Consider Prior to Emailing a Labor Law Attorney is whether to consult with a hourly law firm or a no win no fee contingency lawyer. Considering the excessive number of assets that enormous companies can get, the most efficient option for employees is to retain a  contingency fee Employment Attorney. Indeed, this option, as opposed to Retaining a hourly law firm, is attractive when considering that the lawyers are not paid unless they win a settlement for you and the bigger trial verdict they get for you, the more money the attorney gets so you can be confident that the law firm will make their best effort.

The second Hidden Issues You Need to Know Before Hiring a Labor Law Attorney is whether or not the attorneys has a track record of success. Although a track record of success cannot guarantee a favorable trial verdict in your suit, history has a tendency to repeat itself and it is far fetched when the same Employment Law Attorneys  get victories.

The final Important Secrets One Should Know Prior to Seeking Advice from a Employment Law Lawyer is where the attorney maintains its employment law office. A lot of California employment lawyers usually have offices throughout the state of California.

Higher Out of State Tuition: Constitutional?

This post is dedicated to the lawsuit entitled Lambert v. UC Regents of the University of California which was filed in the Southern District of California. The lawsuit against the UC Regents alleges that it is unconstitutional to charge out of state students more tuition than in state students. Stay tuned and bookmark this page to learn more about the progress of the lawsuit. Click here to read a copy of the lawsuit that was filed against the UC Regents alleging that it is unconstitutional to charge out of state students higher tuition rates than in state students.


Advice on Employment Law from top San Diego Discrimination Attorney:

California employees who believe their rights are being violated at their place of work should read this short piece of advice regarding employment law from a San Diego discrimination attorney. The topic of discrimination is among the most common topics in which the rights of employees tend to be violated.

According to the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), discrimination against an employee for the purpose of discouraging or encouraging unionization is an unfair labor practice. Interestingly, any two or more unaffiliated employees who engage in activities may qualify to serve the purpose of Section 8(a)(3) of the NLRA, even if there is no formal organization which they are specifically acting on behalf of. Whether in regards to hire, tenure or any other term or condition of employment, the employer cannot commit this type of discrimination. The San Diego discrimination attorney has been defending California employees who have suffered similar discrimination issues for over a decade.

It can be very difficult for employers to prove no link exists between an act of discipline toward an employee who broke a work rule and the fact that this employee participated in a union activity. Until the employer can prove such discipline would have taken place even if the employee had not participated in the union activity, it remains an unlawful punishment. Contact a San Diego discrimination attorney if you participated in a union activity and, consequently received an unlawful punishment from your employer.

Many employees who consult a San Diego discrimination attorney are unclear what exactly constitutes a violation of the NLRA. Here are a few common violations: firing, suspending or demoting an employee because he/she urged other employees to join a union; granting seniority to those who replace employees participating in a legal strike; and refusing to hire qualified applicants as a result of them belonging to a union. These are just a few examples out of many which a San Diego discrimination attorney can help defend you against in order to recover the compensation you deserve.

Contact the San Diego discrimination attorney with questions or concerns.

"Good Cause" to Fire: Do Companies Need It?

According to California law, an at-will employment may be ended by both employees and companies at any time {without|with out|even if there is not| cause, for any or no reason. An at-will employment could also be terminated at any time, with or without trigger, for any lawful motive or no reason at all, assuming that there was no violation of public coverage involved.Just as an at-will employment may be terminated at any time, an at-will worker could also be demoted at any time; similar precept extends to an employer's unilateral change within the terms of employment, such as a wage reduction.

There is presumption of at-will employment if the employees and the companies have not made explicit oral or written agreement specifying size of employment or grounds for termination; nevertheless, such presumption may be overcome by proof that regardless of absence of specified time period, parties agreed that employer's authority to {fire|terminate|get rid of| could be restricted not directly, e.g., by requirement that firing be based solely on “good cause.” In employment context, elements apart from consideration and express phrases may be used to establish existence and content of employment agreement, including personnel policies or practices of employer, employee's longevity of service, actions or communications by employer reflecting assurances of continued employment, and practices of business through which employee is engaged

According to California law, undeniable fact that worker's supervisor received poor efficiency opinions didn't overcome presumption of at-will employment and form implied contract allowing termination solely upon displaying of excellent cause; employee and supervisor weren't equally situated, there was no showing that somebody in worker's place would stay employed given a number of and persevering with notes and comments of poor efficiency supplied to employee, and worker didn't argue he was aware of supervisor's efficiency evaluations earlier than or at time of termination.

3 Secrets on Hiring Employment Lawyers

CA can be considered one of the greatest destinations in the world. Many of the biggest businesses in the universe have started locations in the state. Nevertheless, despite the fact that it is one of the ultimate places in the country, people have recently been seeking legal advice about wrongful employment law activity relating to wrongful termination laws, discrimination laws and wage & hour laws.

Before Consulting With a California Employment Law Firm, there are Several Important Factors One Should Think About:

The first thing that one need to Assess Before Retaining a Employment Law Attorney is not shockingly money. Many workers striving to sue their current or former employer don't have the finances needed to go up against a large company in a lawsuit stemming from wrongful employment law conduct dealing with illicit employees rights with respect to workplace discrimination laws. As a result the first, important issue You Should Assess Before Consulting With a Labor Law Attorney is whether to look for a hourly lawyer or a contingency fee lawyer. Considering the excessive quantity of resources that enormous companies are able to access, the better option for employees is to retain a contingency fee Employment Law Lawyer. After all, this choice, in contrast to Seeking Advice from a hourly law firm, seems right based on the fact that the lawyers do not get paid unless they get a settlement for you and the more money they get for you, the more money the lawyer gets so you can be confident that the law firm will try their hardest.

The second Significant Issues Employees Must Think About Prior to Emailing a Employment Law Firm is if the attorneys has a history of big settlements and judgments. Even though a track record of success cannot guarantee a victory in your case, history usually repeats itself and it is surprising when the same Employment Law Firms get victories.

The final Significant Things Workers Ought to Know Before Retaining a Employment Law Firm is where the attorneys is located. The best California worker attorneys usually have offices all over the state. For example, an employee in the San Diego area would benefit from hiring a San Diego Employment Lawyer.

The Truth About Work Related Business Expenses

According to the Labor Code section 2802, employers are required to reimburse employees for all expenses or losses in direct consequence to the performance of their duties assigned by the employer. In most cases, such expenses arise during assignments requiring business travel, in the form of mileage, ticket and dining costs.

Regarding mileage, employers are required to reimburse employees at or below the rate specified by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), and anything beyond the IRS rate may be taxable as wages. The IRS mileage reimbursement rate, which is based on a national average of the cost of operating a motor vehicle including initial purchase/lease cost, repairs, maintenance, fluctuating fuel costs, and cost of insurance, contemplates all reasonable costs associated with automobile expenses and is approved by a Court decision. The employer must show sufficiency if it plans to use a lower mileage rate than the IRS rate, which proves it is reimbursing employees for their actual business travel expenses.

A new rate of 55.5 cents per mile takes effect on July 1, 2011, which was very recently decided upon by the IRS as a midyear increase. The new rate applies to all business travel miles driven from July 1, 2011, through December 31, 2011. Due to constantly changing prices and regulations, employees should always visit the IRS website for the most up-to-date rate.

Since common wage laws (such as those regulating the time and place of earnings payment) do not apply to expense reimbursements, the employer may reimburse such costs on any reasonable schedule. According to the California Supreme Court, employers are allowed to reimburse employees for business travel expenses by paying them a lump sum reimbursement in addition to their wages, so long as the wages and the reimbursement amount are clearly itemized.

There are three approved reimbursement methods clarified by the Court, defined as follows:

Actual Expense Method: this method is fairly self explanatory – it simply requires the employer to keep detailed records of all actual expenses including fuel, maintenance, repairs, insurance, registration, and depreciation. Since this is obviously a very burdensome method, very few employers choose to use the actual expense method to calculate business travel reimbursement costs.

Mileage Reimbursement Method: this method tends to be the most common in use, because it simply requires the employee to track the number of miles driven to perform the required job duties and submit that information to the employer. In this case, the employer would use the IRS rate per mile to repay the employee for business travel expenses. However, because the IRS rate is an approximation of actual expenses, it is less accurate than the actual expense method, so an employee must be permitted to challenge the resulting reimbursement payment.

Lump Sum Payment: in this method, employers pay a fixed amount for business travel reimbursements instead of employees submitting documentation of expenses. The amount is based on the employers' general understanding of each employee's job duties, including the number of miles an employee routinely drives to perform those duties. Although this is a Court approved method, it was specified that it is only appropriate if the lump sum is sufficient to provide full reimbursement for actual expenses, and employees can still challenge the lump sum amount if they believe it is inadequate.

If you believe your employer is failing to properly reimburse you for business travel expenses following an accurate method as described above, you may be eligible to file a claim. Contact the California employment law attorneys at Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik if so.