Kern County Civil Rights Wrongful Death Lawsuit Raises Questions About Care and Supervision of Minor
/
A federal civil rights lawsuit pending in the Eastern District of California centers on the death of a minor identified in court records as A.P. The case, filed against the County of Kern and additional defendants, includes wrongful death and constitutional claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
Case: Perez et al. v. County of Kern et al.
Court: U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California
Federal Case No.: 1:25-cv-00358
The Plaintiffs: Perez et al. v. County of Kern et al.
According to the court-supported order, Ashley Sinden filed claims as the natural parent and purported successor in interest of decedent minor Alejandro Andres Perez, identified in the order as A.P.
The lawsuit seeks damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 based on alleged actions and/or failures involving the care, custody, control, and supervision of A.P. while under the defendants’ supervision.
The plaintiffs allege that those actions and/or failures resulted in the wrongful death of the minor. The court-supported materials reviewed for this case study do not independently verify additional factual allegations beyond those identified in the federal order.
The Defendants: Perez et al. v. County of Kern et al.
The wrongful death lawsuit names the County of Kern and additional defendants identified in the case caption.
Civil rights litigation involving governmental entities often centers on questions concerning constitutional protections, supervisory responsibilities, and alleged failures involving individuals in public custody or under governmental oversight. Cases involving minors frequently receive especially close scrutiny because of the legal duties associated with care and supervision.
The federal court order reviewed in this matter focused on procedural issues involving litigation competency and guardian ad litem appointment standards rather than the underlying factual merits of the wrongful death allegations.
A History of the Case: Perez et al. v. County of Kern et al.
The litigation is pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California under Case No. 1:25-cv-00358.
A significant procedural ruling occurred on July 21, 2025, when the federal court denied without prejudice the plaintiffs’ motion to appoint Clayton Nunley as guardian ad litem for Ashley Sinden.
According to the court’s order, the materials submitted in support of the motion did not establish that Sinden was legally incompetent or unable to understand and participate in the litigation. As a result, the court denied the request without prejudice, meaning the issue could potentially be revisited with additional supporting evidence or information.
The order also set a scheduling conference for August 13, 2025, as litigation continued in federal court.
The Main Question Being Considered: Perez et al. v. County of Kern et al.
The underlying lawsuit involves constitutional and wrongful death claims arising from alleged actions and/or failures while A.P. was under the defendants’ care, custody, control, and supervision.
The July 21, 2025 order addressed a narrower procedural question: whether Ashley Sinden was required to appoint a guardian ad litem to participate in the litigation. Federal courts may appoint guardians ad litem when a party is legally incompetent or otherwise unable to protect their interests during litigation proceedings.
The court’s ruling did not determine liability or decide whether constitutional violations or wrongful death claims will ultimately succeed.
Why This Case Matters: Perez et al. v. County of Kern et al.
Wrongful death and Section 1983 lawsuits involving minors under governmental supervision often raise significant constitutional and public-policy concerns. Cases of this nature may involve questions regarding oversight responsibilities, care standards, and governmental accountability.
The litigation also highlights an important procedural aspect of federal civil rights cases: courts carefully evaluate whether litigants are capable of participating in legal proceedings before appointing guardians ad litem.
For families pursuing civil rights claims, the case reflects the procedural and constitutional issues that frequently arise in federal wrongful death litigation involving public entities and minors.
FAQ: Perez et al. v. County of Kern et al.
Q: What is the Perez v. County of Kern lawsuit about?
A: The lawsuit involves wrongful death and federal civil rights claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 connected to the death of a minor identified in court records as A.P.
Q: Who filed the lawsuit?
A: Ashley Sinden filed claims as the natural parent and purported successor in interest of decedent minor Alejandro Andres Perez.
Q: What did the federal court decide in July 2025?
A: On July 21, 2025, the court denied without prejudice a motion seeking the appointment of Clayton Nunley as guardian ad litem for Ashley Sinden.
Q: Why did the court deny the guardian ad litem request?
A: According to the order, the submitted materials did not establish that Sinden was legally incompetent or unable to understand and participate in the litigation.
Q: Did the court rule on whether constitutional violations or wrongful death occurred?
A: No. The July 21, 2025 ruling addressed only the guardian ad litem request and did not resolve the merits of the underlying claims.
If you have questions about wrongful death litigation, contact Blumenthal Nordrehaug Bhowmik DeBlouw LLP. Experienced wrongful death attorneys are ready to help at offices in Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Sacramento, Riverside, and Chicago.
