Guardsmark Slammed with a Class Action for Violating State Wage & Hour Laws

Security employees and the California employment attorneys at Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik filed a class action against Guardsmark, LLC, claiming the company failed to comply with California wage & hour laws when they deprived employees of compensation for mandatory training sessions after being hired and unlawfully deducted uniform expenses from previously earned wages.


More updates will be posted on this class action in the coming weeks.

Loan Officers File Class Action Against Guaranteed Rate, Inc. alleging minimum and overtime compensation violations

On July 26, 2011, a class action lawsuit was filed by the California employment lawyers at Blumenthal, Nordrehaug & Bhowmik against Guaranteed Rate, Inc. alleging that the mortgage lender has violated the rights of loan officers under the California Labor Code. The class action complaint alleges that the mortgage lender unlawfully paid loan officers below minimum wage, failed to compensate them for overtime hours worked and unjustly deducted expenses from previously earned wages.

Stay tuned to this blog for continuous updates on this class action lawsuit.

AutoNation Sales Associate Class Action Lawsuit Filed in Santa Clara Superior Court

A class action lawsuit was filed against AutoNation on June 21, 2011, alleging that the car dealer violated California wage & hour laws by forcing Sales Associates to forfeit earned wages and failing to compensate them for overtime hours worked.

Click Here to read a copy of the class action complaint against AutoNation

Under California overtime laws, employers are required to pay employees overtime compensation for all hours worked in excess of eight hours in a single workday or forty hours in a workweek. In addition, it is unlawful for an employer to take back any portion of an employee’s wages previously paid to said employee according to the California Labor Code, including sales commissions so long as the commissions have been earned by the employees under the operate agreement.

Continue to check this Blog for more details on the AutoNation Sales Associate class action lawsuit.


AT&T AT-Home Virtual Call Center Employee Class Action Lawsuit

On March 28, 2011, a class action lawsuit was filed against AT&T and Arise in the Northern District of California alleging that the companies are misclassifying at-home call center employees as independent contractors in violation of the law. This is the official page dedicated to the AT&T at-home virtual call center class action lawsuit. As progress is made in the action, updates will be made to this page.

Salary Employee Laws Explained

In all workplaces, employees are either classified as exempt or non-exempt as it pertains to whether various wage and hour regulations apply to them. In general, exempt employees are those who primarily have management and decision-making responsibilities. Some common examples are executive, administrative, or professional employees as well as certain types of inside or outside salespeople. The misclassification of employees’ exempt status has been a fruitful source of overtime back pay awards won from litigation.

Job titles can often be misleading when categorizing different employee’s exempt statuses. For example, even though some employees may have an impressive job title (e.g. manager) a closer look at their responsibilities might reveal that they should be classified as non-exempt. State and federal law have created rules to define what exactly constitutes an exempt employee. These rules all have two requirements: a minimum salary requirement and a general description of job duties which the employee must exercise in order to be classified as exempt.

As for the salary requirement, all exempt employees must earn at least two times the state minimum wage for full-time employment. In California, this would compute to $2,773.33 per month. The duties requirement will vary depending on the type of employee. Generally, exempt employees customarily and regularly exercise discretion and independent judgment in their jobs. These judgments must be free from immediate supervision and must be of real and substantial significance to the policies or general operations of the business or its customers. It can also involve making recommendations for action to a superior authority. “Customarily and regularly” means frequently in the course of their day-to-day activities.

Starbucks Wage & Hour Class Action Lawsuit

On May 24, 2011 a Class Action Lawsuit was filed against Coffee Giant, Starbucks on behalf of Baristas employed in California over the past four years. The class action alleges that Starbucks failed to properly compensate employees for training time, including time spent "reviewing, memorizing and completing Starbucks training materials," and for completing "'written quizzes' away from Starbucks' retail store locations."